The nagging issue with the federal government estimate, Roe says, is that total eradication of the most common factors behind food-borne illness is practically impossible because of the exorbitant cost required to achieve such a goal. And, he added, the more flexible approach to measurement proposed in this research suggests that consumers are ready to pay more than anticipated for an outcome that offers much less than total eradication of pathogens. ‘We believe what we are measuring is even more realistic, as complete eradication is a highly unlikely outcome for any policy,’ Roe said.What legal options does the patient have in these circumstances? Doctors generally advise that if a person has rectal blood or bleeding in the stool, testing needs to be conducted to make sure the patient does not have colon cancer. The test that’s mostly used to rule out colon cancer is named a colonoscopy. This involves using a flexible scope with a video camera on the finish to examine the within of the colon. If growths are found, they may be biopsied and perhaps removed through the procedure. The samples are then examined for the existence of tumor. If no cancer is available, then colon cancer could be eliminated as the reason behind the blood often.